Non-surgical buccal fat removal

Patrick K. Sullivan

Non-surgical alternatives to buccal fat removal offer less invasive options for those looking to reduce cheek volume without surgery.

While effective, it is important to maintain realistic expectations about these treatments. Non-surgical methods generally provide subtler results than surgical removal and often require multiple sessions to achieve the desired outcome.

5 non-surgical options

For those considering non-surgical ways to reduce buccal fat, there are several effective treatments that mimic the effects of buccal fat removal by contouring and slimming the face. Here are five popular non-surgical options:

Thread lift

A thread lift uses temporary, absorbable sutures to tighten and lift the skin, providing a more defined facial contour similar to buccal fat removal. This procedure can subtly lift sagging skin, thereby enhancing the jawline and cheekbones.

Facial filler

Injectable fillers can be used strategically to sculpt the facial structure. Although primarily used to add volume, when applied to areas like the cheeks or jawline, fillers can create a more balanced look that reduces the appearance of prominent buccal fat pads.

FaceTite

FaceTite is a minimally invasive procedure that uses radiofrequency energy to tighten skin and melt fat. This treatment can target lower face fat, including buccal fat, offering a firmer, more defined facial contour.

Fotona4D

Fotona4D is a multi-step laser treatment that works on deeper, middle, and superficial layers of the skin to lift, firm, and tighten. It's effective for overall facial rejuvenation and can indirectly reduce the appearance of buccal fat.

Forma facial

Forma uses radiofrequency technology to provide optimal skin contraction in the deep layers of the skin. Regular treatments can lead to tightened skin and reduced fat, which helps contour the cheeks and reduce the prominence of buccal fat.

Limitations with non-surgical alternatives

While non-surgical treatments come with benefits like minimal downtime and lower costs, there are also notable limitations:[Text Wrapping Break]

Limited results

Non-surgical options typically offer less dramatic results compared to surgical buccal fat removal and might result in uneven outcomes.

Temporary effects

The effects of non-surgical treatments are usually temporary, requiring ongoing treatments to maintain the results.

Less safety than a surgical treatment

While generally safe, non-surgical treatments carry risks, especially if not performed by an experienced provider. Inadequate treatment can lead to complications or unsatisfactory results.

Multiple treatments needed

Achieving the desired aesthetic often requires multiple sessions, which can increase the overall cost and commitment compared to a single surgical procedure.

Consult Adoreal for expert guidance

Choosing between surgical and non-surgical buccal fat removal options requires careful consideration of your aesthetic goals and physical characteristics. Adoreal provides expert guidance, helping you to understand which procedures can best meet your needs and connecting you with top-tier cosmetic physicians.

Schedule your consultation today